Rethinking Faculty Models/Roles: An Emerging Consensus about Future Directions for the Professoriate

April 2016
Related Topics
The Changing Professoriate

Today, some 70% of faculty at U.S. institutions hold full- or part-time nontenure-track positions, and a return to the days of a largely tenure-track faculty is highly unlikely. What’s less clear is what future faculty models should look like.

Summary

The TIAA Institute commissioned a survey of hundreds of higher education stakeholders to gain their views on new faculty models. The results indicate substantial areas of agreement among faculty, administrators and others on many of the proposals listed in the survey, as well as concerns about the feasibility of some changes. Pessimistic views about feasibility, however, may be due more to stereotypes and external pressures than to campus realities.

Key Insights
Stakeholders largely agree on the need for more full-time faculty, having a scholarly element in all faculty roles, fostering more faculty collaboration, differentiating roles based on teaching and research, and developing a broader view of scholarship.
Most stakeholders also agree on the need to maintain and restore professionalism in the faculty role, which concerns such issues as protecting academic freedom, career advancement, equitable pay, professional development and shared governance.
Despite interest in some proposals – such as creativity contracts, more flexible faculty roles and the creation of consortial hiring arrangements – some stakeholder groups questioned the feasibility of implementation.
A few hot button issues remain controversial, including phasing out tenure and aligning faculty work with departmental and institutional needs.
Methodology

The survey was administered through national higher education associations in February and March 2015. More than 1,500 higher education stakeholders participated, including tenure and nontenure-track faculty, deans, provosts and accreditors.

Only 30% of faculty hold tenure-track positions—a proportion not likely to change.
Download Report Materials
Authors

About TIAA Institute

The TIAA Institute helps advance the ways individuals and institutions plan for financial security and organizational effectiveness. The Institute conducts in depth research, provides access to a network of thought leaders, and enables those it serves to anticipate trends, plan future strategies and maximize opportunities for success.
Related Publications

Related Publications

Testing methods to enhance longevity awareness

March 2021

Many people have only a vague notion of the concept of longevity risk, which in turn implies they are likely to save too little for retirement and have a low demand for longevity insurance products.

Aryal_March2021_Fig1_173

Auctioning annuities

March 2021

What makes a market for annuity contracts successful, and what are the key demand and supply constraints that affect the performance of such a market?

Skimmyhorn_March2021_Fig2_173

How do behavioral approaches to increase savings compare? Evidence from multiple interventions in the U.S. Army

March 2021

Behavioral researchers have explored a variety of potential “nudges” designed to increase retirement savings. But selecting from among different approaches can be surprisingly difficult.