Academic Workforce Flexibility and Strategic Outcomes in Four-Year Colleges and Universities

December 2017

Has increased use of contingent faculty led to real improvements in institutional performance? This report explores the strategic payoffs of a well-documented trend in academia.

Summary

In recent decades institutions have made ever-greater use of contingent faculty, with seemingly mixed results. Analyzing 12 years of data from roughly 1,200 colleges and universities, the authors examine how the rise in contingent faculty has affected enrollment levels, student applications, admission yield, student-faculty ratios, six-year graduation rates, and net revenues. Sectors studied include public and private doctoral, master's and baccalaureate institutions across the U.S.

Key Insights
The proportion of contingent faculty has had no discernable effect on institutional enrollment.
Higher levels of contingent faculty are associated with lower application volume at private baccalaureates; lower graduation rates in private doctorals; and lower net revenues in public baccalaureates.
Across all sectors studied, higher nontenure-track commitments were associated with lower student-faculty ratios. But absent more information on teaching loads, one cannot assume the improved ratios led to smaller class sizes.
Methodology

The authors based their conclusions on 1) empirical evidence of trends related to contingent faculty hiring, using data from the Higher Education General Information Survey and IPEDS for the years 2002 through 2013; 2) quantitative analyses of institutional panel data on relationships over time between contingent faculty levels and institutional outcomes; and 3) interviews with institutional leaders and observers regarding the connection between workplace flexibility and strategic results at their institutions.

Contingent working arrangements in any occupation present risks and benefits. But the trade-offs In higher education are particularly complex given the sector's employment and governance traditions.
Download Report Materials
Authors
Burns

Rachel Burns

Institute of Higher Education at the University of Georgia

About TIAA Institute

The TIAA Institute helps advance the ways individuals and institutions plan for financial security and organizational effectiveness. The Institute conducts in depth research, provides access to a network of thought leaders, and enables those it serves to anticipate trends, plan future strategies and maximize opportunities for success.
Related Publications

Related Publications

Toutkoushian Figure Image

How Do College Employees Select between Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Retirement Plans?

July 2018

Given the complexity – and risks – of choosing between a defined benefit plan and a defined contribution plan, how do university employees decide?

Toutkoushian Figure Image

How Do Faculty and Staff Select between Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Retirement Plans?

July 2018

Given the complexity – and risks – of choosing between a defined benefit plan and a defined contribution plan, how do university employees decide?

Managing Implicit Bias

Managing Implicit Bias with Diversity and Inclusion

June 2018

Many employers have sought to eradicate behaviors associated with explicit bias. But implicit, or unconscious, bias still has a profound effect on organizational leaders.